Rolling Down Ramp - Question on Friction

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a cylinder rolling down a ramp with a rope pulling it upward, the direction of friction is clarified to always act up the ramp. This friction is necessary to provide the torque required for the cylinder to roll correctly without slipping. The confusion arises from the simultaneous presence of the cylinder rolling down the ramp while friction still points upward. Understanding the mechanics of rolling motion helps clarify that friction opposes the relative motion at the contact point. Overall, the relationship between rolling motion, friction, and torque is essential for visualizing the scenario accurately.
TORQ12
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
You have a cylinder rolling down a ramp, without slipping. There is a rope wrapped around it (pulling up) with tension T.

The direction of friction is always up the ramp. How do I picture this? From the math, I know that it must be true. But I cannot really imagine it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you know the cylinder rolls down the ramp. What kind of torque would be necessary for the cylinder to roll the correct way? If that was provided by a force at the place of contact between the cylinder and the ramp, where would that force point?
 
You say that I know the cylinder rolls down the ramp. That is not necessarily true--I understand that case (I think). But friction also points up the ramp if the cylinder rolls down it. It's the fact that it's up in both cases that confuses me.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top