As far as I'm aware, that is not possible. And why delete proof that you resolved your own doubt?KEVmathematics said:
Rolling in a cone refers to the movement of a round object, such as a ball or wheel, along the surface of a cone-shaped object. This type of movement is characterized by the rolling object maintaining contact with the cone at all times, resulting in a circular path.
Normal force is the force exerted by a surface on an object in contact with it, perpendicular to the surface. In the case of rolling in a cone, the normal force is what allows the circular motion to occur. As the rolling object moves along the cone, the normal force changes direction, keeping the object on its circular path.
The normal force in rolling in a cone is affected by the weight of the rolling object, the angle of the cone, and the friction between the rolling object and the cone. A heavier object will have a greater normal force, while a steeper cone or higher friction will result in a greater normal force.
Yes, it is possible for the normal force to be greater than the weight of the rolling object in rolling in a cone. This can occur when the angle of the cone is steep enough or when there is a high amount of friction between the rolling object and the cone.
Rolling in a cone is different from rolling on a flat surface in that it involves circular motion instead of linear motion. Additionally, the normal force in rolling in a cone is constantly changing direction, whereas the normal force in rolling on a flat surface remains constant.
