How Far Will a Rolling Ball Go?

AI Thread Summary
A ball rolling on a horizontal rough floor will eventually stop due to rolling resistance rather than friction. The primary factor in this resistance is the energy loss from the deformation of both the ball and the surface it rolls on. Although kinetic friction plays a role during the deformation at the contact patch, static friction does not contribute to stopping the ball. The distance the ball travels before stopping is influenced by these forces and torques acting on it. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the motion of rolling objects.
Soumyajit6
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If a ball is given a velocity, and left on horizontal rough floor then after what distance it will stop rollig (slippingis absent) ?
Explain with force and torque acting on it .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction isn't required to slow and stop the rotation of a ball. The main reason for the torque is related to rolling resistance, most of which is due to energy loss from deformation as the surface of the ball compresses and then expands. There's also energy loss as the surface the ball is rolling on also compresses and expands. Kinectic (sliding) friction that occurs during the deformation at the contact patch, such as squirming, is also a component of rolling resistance (and for this component the friction does matter, but not static friction).

Wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top