Roots of Trigonometric polynomials?

wk1989
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
I remember learning an iterative method that gives the answer to trigonometric polynomials such as

sin(x)-0.7-0.611cosx = 0

where x is the angle in degrees.

The person who I learned this method from called it the method for solving transcendentals. Now I can't seem to find any information on this method, could anyone please enlighten me by providing the information?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The approach is similar, but I don't remember taking any derivatives when using the method I was taught, and I think it involved multiplying the result of iteration rather then subtracting (as with Newton's method).
 
wk1989 said:
The person who I learned this method from called it the method for solving transcendentals.

I don't know if there is one method known as the method for solving transcendentals; however, there are several iterative methods for solving equations such as the one you posted. For example, the most basic numerical root-finding method, the bisection method, could be used. And it doesn't use derivatives.

There is also the secant method.

And others.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top