Rotating two different complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the existence of a positive integer n such that the arguments of two complex numbers, a and b, can be rotated into specific ranges. It is proposed that for any two complex numbers with different arguments, there exists an n satisfying the conditions -pi/2 <= Arg(a^n) <= pi/2 and pi/2 <= Arg(b^n) <= 3pi/2. However, it is pointed out that this is not universally true, particularly for cases where a = -1 and b = 1, as rational arguments lead to a limited number of integer power images. The conversation suggests that the condition may only require the arguments to be in different halves of the complex plane. The proof for the modified condition is noted to be straightforward.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Let's say that I have two complex numbers, a and b, with different arguments. From a few "experiments" with a computer, I think that there always exists a positive integer n such that -pi/2 <= Arg(a^n) <= pi/2 and pi/2 <= Arg(b^n) <= 3pi/2.
In other words, if Arg(a) = thetaA and Arg(b) = thetaB, then there exists an n such that
-pi/2 <= n*thetaA <= pi/2 and pi/2 <= n*thetaB <= 3pi/2 up to a multiple of 2pi.
Is this true? If so, how can I start to prove it?
Thanks,
Daniel
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not true for a = -1 and b = 1. In general, if both a and b have rational arguments they will only have a finite number of integer power images so it seems likely that you may find a whole range of argument pairs for which your condition will never be satisfied.
 
Do you just need them to be in different halves? In other words, is it sufficient that
<br /> |\textrm{arg}(a^n)-\textrm{arg}(b^n)| = n\cdot |\textrm{arg}(a)-\textrm{arg}(b)| \geq \pi <br />
-modulo 2\pi of course?

As Flip Larsen commented, you can't necessarily pick which is in which half...the above is definitely true, though. The proof is pretty much immediate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top