Rotation in Space: Rod, ISS, Yoyo Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter azizlwl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Space
AI Thread Summary
Tapping one end of a rod in the ISS will cause it to rotate about an axis, likely near the end that is tapped, resulting in both translational and rotational motion. The axis of rotation is influenced by the distribution of mass along the rod, with the motion starting at the tapped end and propagating to the other end. In contrast, when a stick is thrown into the air, it appears to rotate around its center of mass. The discussion also touches on yoyo motion, questioning whether a yoyo can be spun while in a floating position. Overall, the mechanics of rotation in microgravity highlight the complex interplay of forces and motion.
azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
We have a rod and keep floating in ISS. If we tap giving force at one end, will it,
1. Rotate about an axis or
2. Has translational and rotational motion.
If it rotates, where is the axis?

I have interest in yoyo motion too. From YouTube, they spin them while holding. Can we rotate yoyo from floating position?.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azizlwl said:
We have a rod and keep floating in ISS. If we tap giving force at one end, will it,
1. Rotate about an axis or
2. Has translational and rotational motion.
If it rotates, where is the axis?
What do you think?
 
I think it rotates with the axis of the other end, since the near end moves first followed by nearest mass till the other end.
But if we throw a stick to the air it looks like it rotates about the center.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top