Rotation of the stress tensor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rotation of the stress tensor in the context of material mechanics, specifically focusing on the relationship between stress components and stiffness coefficients in a system described by a stiffness matrix. The original poster is exploring the implications of a rotation on the invariance of the stiffness coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the transformation of stress and strain components under rotation, questioning the invariance of stiffness coefficients. The original poster attempts to derive relationships between the coefficients and expresses confusion regarding the implications of the rotation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the nature of the stiffness coefficients, noting that they may not be invariant in anisotropic materials. There is ongoing exploration of how to relate the transformed stress components to the original ones, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the system involves anisotropic materials, which affects the invariance of the stiffness coefficients during coordinate transformations. There is also reference to specific equations from external notes that participants are using for comparison.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Rotation of ##\pi /4## of the stress tensor around the Z-axis
Relevant Equations
$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy} + C_{12}D_{zz}$$
First of all I have this system

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{xy} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ D_{xy} \\ D_{yz} \\ D_{zx} \end{pmatrix}$$

Then I perform a rotation of ##\pi /4## around the z-axis.

For ##\tau_{xy}## I get

$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}$$

Also,
$$\tau_{xy} = C_{44}D_{xy}$$

The answer I'm looking for is ##C_{11} = C_{44} + C_{12}##

I read that the ##C_{ij}## must be invariant. What does it means here ? Since there is no ##D_{xy}## term in the expression for ##\tau'_{xy}## , ##C_{44}## must be 0 and ##C_{12} = C_{11}##?

However, this is not the right answer. I'm not sure to understand.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
happyparticle said:
First of all I have this system

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{xy} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ D_{xy} \\ D_{yz} \\ D_{zx} \end{pmatrix}$$
I assume the ##\tau_{ij}## are components of stress and the ##D_{ij}## are components of strain. Check to make sure that you have written this correctly. For example, look at equation (3.13) in these notes. Note carefully the indices in the last three entries of the stress column vector (##\sigma_{ij}##) and also in the strain column vector (##\epsilon_{ij}##). Also, note the factors of 2 in the last three entries of the ##\epsilon_{ij}## vector. Thus, in your notation for stress and strain, this would be

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \\ \tau_{xy} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ 2D_{yz} \\ 2D_{zx} \\ 2D_{xy} \end{pmatrix}$$
happyparticle said:
Then I perform a rotation of ##\pi /4## around the z-axis.

For ##\tau_{xy}## I get

$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}$$
OK. I think this is correct.

happyparticle said:
Also,
$$\tau_{xy} = C_{44}D_{xy}$$

The answer I'm looking for is ##C_{11} = C_{44} + C_{12}##

I read that the ##C_{ij}## must be invariant. What does it means here ? Since there is no ##D_{xy}## term in the expression for ##\tau'_{xy}## , ##C_{44}## must be 0 and ##C_{12} = C_{11}##?

However, this is not the right answer. I'm not sure to understand.
In general, for any system, we see from (3.13) and (3.15) in the link above that $$\tau_{xy} = C_{61} D_{xx}+C_{62} D_{yy}+C_{63} D_{zz}+C_{64} (2D_{yz})+C_{65} (2D_{zx})+C_{66} (2D_{xy})$$ For your particular system before the rotation, all of the ##C_{6i} = 0## except ##C_{66}##. So, $$\tau_{xy} =2 C_{66} D_{xy}.$$ Since ##C_{66} = C_{44}## in your system before the rotation, you could write this as $$\tau_{xy} =2 C_{44} D_{xy}.$$ [Edited to fix a couple of typos in the indices]

After the rotation, we use a prime for the various quantities. So, after the rotation, we have $$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (2D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (2D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (2D'_{xy})$$
The stiffness coefficients are not invariant. That is, we cannot assume ##C'_{ij} = C_{ij}##. You will need to work out the values of the ##C'_{6i}## for the system after the rotation. I think you will find that all of the ##C'_{6i} = 0## except for ##C'_{66}##. Show ##C'_{66} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})##.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
You will need to work out the values of the C6i′ for the system after the rotation
I'm not sure what I have to compare. Is ##\tau_{xy}## is the same after rotation ? Hence, I can compare it with ##\tau'_{xy}##. I guess... It it not clear for me what I have to do. I see like 4 equations, but I don't see any relationship between them.

Edit:

I read the link you gave and I think I have to compare $$
\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}
$$ with
$$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (D'_{xy}) $$

However, I'm not sure why exactly. Also it gaves me
##C'_{61} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})## and ##C'_{62} = \frac 1 2 (-C_{11} + C_{12})##
 
Last edited:
The components of the C matrix do not change as a result of a rotation of the coordinate system.
 
happyparticle said:
I read the link you gave and I think I have to compare $$
\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}
$$ with
$$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (D'_{xy}) $$
Yes, in your first post you wrote ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac 1 2 \tau_{xx} - \frac 1 2 \tau_{yy}##. This shows how the stress component ##\tau'_{xy}## after the rotation relates to the stress components before the rotation. From this equation you can get your result ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}##.

It appeared to me that in your first post, you were getting confused because you were considering the stiffnesses ##C_{ij}## as invariant under rotations. But, for an anisotropic medium, the ##C_{ij}## are not generally invariant. For example, ##C'_{66} \neq C_{66}## in the medium you are considering. Instead, ##C'_{66} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11} - C_{12})##. Using this result for ##C'_{66}## along with the results ##C'_{6i} = 0## for ##i = 1, 2, 3, 4##, and ##5##, you can show that the equation $$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (2D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (2D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (2D'_{xy}) $$ agrees with your result ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}##.

But, maybe I misinterpreted your source of confusion in the first post.


happyparticle said:
Also it gaves me
##C'_{61} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})## and ##C'_{62} = \frac 1 2 (-C_{11} + C_{12})##
You should find ##C'_{61} = C'_{62} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
Chestermiller said:
The components of the C matrix do not change as a result of a rotation of the coordinate system.
That's true for an isotropic material. However, in an anisotropic material, the components generally are not invariant under a coordinate rotation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
All right, I think I understand. Also, for an isotropic material after the rotation are the ##C_{ij}## not primed ? For instance, ##\tau'_{ij} = C_{ij}D'{ij}## ?
 
happyparticle said:
All right, I think I understand. Also, for an isotropic material after the rotation are the ##C_{ij}## not primed ? For instance, ##\tau'_{ij} = C_{ij}D'{ij}## ?
Yes. For example, in an isotropic medium, ##\tau_{xx} = C_{11} D_{xx} + C_{12}(D_{yy} + D_{zz})##. After a rotation, none of the ##C## matrix elements change for the isotropic medium. So, you could write ##\tau'_{xx} = C'_{11} D'_{xx} + C'_{12}(D'_{yy} + D'_{zz}) = C_{11} D'_{xx} + C_{12}(D'_{yy} + D'_{zz})##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
All right, Thank you!

I was really confused.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K