Rotational analysis of chain and sprockets system

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the rotational analysis of a chain and sprockets system, it is established that while all points on the chain have the same linear speed, they do not share the same linear acceleration due to the nature of their motion around the sprockets. The points in contact with the sprockets experience radial acceleration directed towards the center of the sprockets, but no tangential acceleration since they maintain a constant linear speed. The relationship between the radial accelerations of the sprockets is defined by the equation arad = rω², indicating that the radial acceleration is proportional to the radius and the square of the angular speed. There is some confusion regarding the definition of "linear acceleration" in the context of the problem, with suggestions that it may not be clearly specified. Overall, the analysis highlights the complexities of motion in a chain-sprocket system and the importance of precise terminology.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Imagine a system consisting of a chain that runs over two sprockets. The chain rotates around the sprockets with a constant linear velocity (i.e. the chain is taut and rigid). The front sprocket has a radius rfront and an angular speed ωfront and the rear sprocket has a radius rrear and an angular speed ωrear.

(a) All points on the chain have the same linear speed. Is the magnitude of the linear acceleration also the same for all points on the chain? How are the angular accelerations of the two sprockets related? Explain.

(b) How are the radial accelerations of points at the teeth of the two sprockets related? Explain the reasoning behind your answer.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Between the two sprockets, the chain moves in a straight line with a constant linear speed. In other words, these points move at a constant linear velocity. Therefore, these points do not have a linear acceleration.

The points which touch each sprocket when they move are rotating along the arc of a circle (that is defined by the sprocket). Therefore, these points have a radial acceleration towards the centre of the sprocket. The points, when they rotate along the arc, move with a constant linear speed. Therefore, these points do not have a tangential acceleration. Anyway, those points have a non-zero linear acceleration.

[The analysis of the points that touch the sprockets assumes that these points and the outer edges of the sprockets move at the same linear speed, i.e. the chain does not slip or stretch.]

Therefore, at any instant of time, all points on the chain do not have the same magnitude of the linear acceleration.


All points that touch the sprockets have the same linear speed. v = rω. Therefore, all those points have the same angular speed. The chain does not slip or stretch. Therefore, each point on the chain and the sprocket that it touches move at the same angular speed. Therefore, the sprockets have the same constant angular speed. Therefore, the sprockets do not have an angular accleration.

(b) arad = rω2. Therefore, \frac{a_{rad,front}}{a_{rad,rear}} = \frac{r_{front}}{r_{rear}}.


Please point out any mistakes in my analysis. As always, thanks in advance for any comments.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
spaghetti3451 said:
at any instant of time, all points on the chain do not have the same magnitude of the linear acceleration.
The question is unclear.
"Linear acceleration" is both a state of motion and the value of the acceleration for an object in that state. A part of the chain going around a sprocket is not in that state, so what does the question mean?
(It is sometimes used to mean the acceleration component in a specified direction, but no direction is specified here.)
If they mean tangential acceleration then it is zero everywhere.

The solution posted for b) wrongly assumes ##\omega## is the same for both sprockets.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top