Rotational Inertia: Mass Distribution & Rolling Object Comparison

AI Thread Summary
Rotational inertia is influenced by both mass and its distribution relative to the axis of rotation. A hoop, with all its mass at a fixed distance, has a higher rotational inertia compared to a solid sphere of the same mass, which has mass distributed closer to the axis. This distribution means that the sphere experiences lower resistance to angular acceleration. Consequently, when rolled, the solid sphere accelerates more easily than the hoop. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the motion of rolling objects.
RPDuece
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Help with this problem...

The Rotational inertia of an object depends not on the mass alone but on the distribution of the mass. Between a hoop and a solid sphere of the same mass which object has higher rotational inertia when they are rolled? Explain how the distribution of the mass affects rotational inertial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intuitively, the further away the mass is from the axis of rotation, the higher the moment of inertia.
In a hoop all the mass is distributed at a fixed distance.
In a sphere there is mass closer to the axis of rotation (assuming it has the same radius as the hoop), so its moment of inertia will be lower.
 
Thank you that helps a lot...
 
RPDuece said:
Help with this problem...

The Rotational inertia of an object depends not on the mass alone but on the distribution of the mass. Between a hoop and a solid sphere of the same mass which object has higher rotational inertia when they are rolled? Explain how the distribution of the mass affects rotational inertial.
The elements of matter contained in rigid body experiencing angular acceleration (ie. a torque acting on it) have different accelerations depending on their distance from the centre of rotation (centre of mass). The mass that is farther from the centre is accelerated more rapidly than mass closer to the centre. So to determine what angular acceleration results from a given torque, one has to compute the rotational inertia of the body, which depends on the distribution of mass in relation to the centre of mass.

AM
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top