Rotational Inertia of Disk2: 16I or 8I?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational inertia of Disk 2, which has a radius of 2R and is compared to Disk 1 with a radius of R and rotational inertia I. The calculations show that the mass of Disk 2 is four times that of Disk 1, leading to a derived rotational inertia of 16I for Disk 2. Despite initial doubts about the result being too high, it is confirmed as correct. The consensus is that doubling the radius indeed results in a significant increase in rotational inertia, which can seem surprising.
The_Journey
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are two uniform disks. Disk 1 has radius of R, a rotational inertia of I. Disk 2 has radius of 2R, what is the rotational inertia of Disk2 in term of I? The disks are rotating about their center axis.


Homework Equations


I = m * r ^ 2
Density = Mass / Area


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using density because the two disks are uniform so their densities must equal. But I don't have the mass for both of the disks so I just call mass of Disk1 to be M. So Disk1 density is:
M / (pi * R^2). Setting it equal to xM / (4 * pi * R ^ 2) and solve for x.

So mass of Disk2 is 4M, which is 4 times the mass of Disk1. I is the rotational inertia of Disk1 so it must be this:

I = (1/2) * M * R ^ 2.

Then the rotational inertia of Disk2, which has Radius of 2R and mass of 4M is:

I2 = (1/2) * (4M) * (2R)^2 = 8 * M * R ^ 2.

Dividing I2 by I gets me 16.

So the answer I think is 16I, the rotational inertia of Disk2 is 16 times the rotational inertia of Disk1, but this seems too high and my friend got 8I, so can anyone show me the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your result is correct. Why do you think it is high?

ehild
 
I guess doubling the radius gets you 16 times the rotational inertia seems kinda crazy. Anyway thank you for verifying
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top