Rotational kinematics - acceleration

AI Thread Summary
To find the acceleration of the suspended mass in the rotational kinematics problem, it's essential to set up equations using Newton's second law for both the wheel/hub system and the hanging mass. The tension in the string is not equal to the weight of the mass but is less, as it causes the mass to accelerate downward. The relationship between angular acceleration (alpha) and linear acceleration (a) is given by a = alpha * r, where r is the radius of the hub. The moment of inertia (I) should account for both the wheel and the hub, as they rotate together as a single system. Understanding these relationships and correctly applying the equations will lead to the solution for the acceleration.
physgirl
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
so there's a wheel with radius R and mass M. there's also a hub attached to the wheel's center with radius r and mass m. there's also a mass X suspended from a massless string that's wound around the hub. if the axle has negligible radius and mass and both wheel and the hub are solid with uniform density, how would you find the acceleration of the suspended mass after its released?

i thought what it was askng for was the tangential acceleration, which i found to be equal to (F*r^2)/I... (since tan acc is r*alpha where alpha is r*F/I because torque = I*alpha and also r*F)... so i tried doing:
[r^2*X*g]/0.5[M*R+m*r]
but that doesn't work and I'm not sure what I am doing wrong... can someone point me in the right direction?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two problems:
(1) The force F pulling on the hub does not equal the weight of the hanging mass. It does equal the tension in the string.
(2) The rotational inertial of a disk is 0.5MR^2.

Set up equations (Newton's 2nd law) for both wheel/hub and hanging mass and solve them together to get the acceleration.
 
1- isn't the tension of the string the same thing as mg?

also, what do you mean by "set up equations... to get the acceleration"? the 2nd law equation for the wheel/hub would be (m+M)alpha=F and for the hanging mass it would be F=Xg?...? I'm lost :(
 
physgirl said:
1- isn't the tension of the string the same thing as mg?
No. Think about it: if the tension in the string was equal to mg, then the net force on the mass would be zero. It would just sit there. (This is what would happen if you hung the mass from a string that was fixed to the roof, say.) But since that string moves, the tension will be less than mg.

also, what do you mean by "set up equations... to get the acceleration"? the 2nd law equation for the wheel/hub would be (m+M)alpha=F and for the hanging mass it would be F=Xg?...?
Here are the equations you need:
(a) Torque = I alpha ==> Fr = I_total*alpha = I_total*a/r
(b) Xg - F = Xa

Note: We know that the acceleration is down, so I take down to be positive.
 
I see, this is probably a dumb question but why did you go from Fr=I_total*alpha => F = I_total*a/r (that is, alpha to a?)

and if you didn't mean to switch over... I know I'm supposed to be solving for acceleration, so how do i know what alpha is?

lastly... I don't really understand the concept of "I"... the mass and radius of what object is supposed to be involved...? is it everything that's involved in the whole system? or just the wheel that's actually doing the turning? or just the hub that the string is directly attached to? or both?
 
physgirl said:
I see, this is probably a dumb question but why did you go from Fr=I_total*alpha => F = I_total*a/r (that is, alpha to a?)
Why? Because we are trying to find "a", not alpha. Since the wheel/hub is connected to the hanging mass via the string, alpha can be related to "a" via: a = alpha*r (where r is the radius of the hub that the string wraps around).

and if you didn't mean to switch over... I know I'm supposed to be solving for acceleration, so how do i know what alpha is?
They are directly related. (See above.)

lastly... I don't really understand the concept of "I"... the mass and radius of what object is supposed to be involved...? is it everything that's involved in the whole system? or just the wheel that's actually doing the turning? or just the hub that the string is directly attached to? or both?
The whole thing turns as one piece, so you must use the "I" for the entire wheel/hub object--which is just the sum of I_wheel and I_hub.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
759
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
78
Views
9K
Back
Top