Rotational Kinematics of a turntable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a rotational kinematics problem involving a uniform disk and a non-rotating rod dropped onto it. The key concept is the conservation of angular momentum, where the initial angular momentum of the disk equals the final angular momentum of the combined system. The initial angular velocity of the disk is 8.0 rev/s, and upon adding the rod, the final angular velocity is derived to be 8π Rad/s. The participants express uncertainty regarding the equal radius of the rod and disk and the implications of different moments of inertia. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding rotational kinetic energy and moments of inertia in solving such problems.
ziggo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Good afternoon! I've been mulling over this question for a bit and I can't seem to understand what it is asking. This is a question for an introductory calculus-based physics university course.

1. The Problem:

A uniform disk, such as a record turntable, turns 8.0 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A non-rotating rod of the same mass as the disk is dropped onto the freely spinning disk so that both turn around the spindle. Determine the angular velocity of the combination in rev/s.

2. Equations used:

I interpreted this as a conservation of angular momentum problem where the radius remains constant:

m r^2 ω = m(disc and rod) r ^2 ω(final)

3. The solution:

Since the radius remains constant and the mass doubles, both the mass and radius^2 can be removed from both sides leaving:

ω(initial) = 2ω(final)

and since the initial angular velocity was 16π Rad/s the final angular velocity would be 8π Rad/s.

Am I in the ballpark here assuming that this question is concerning the conservation of angular momentum? I don't see any other way to incorporate mass other than using Newton's laws, but I'm not sure on that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the radius of the rod and the disc necessarily equal?
 
The problem doesn't state it unfortunately.
 
The first thing that comes to my mind is to try solving it with energy, since the moments of inertia of a rod and a disc are different. Have you covered rotational kinetic energy yet?
 
Conservation of angular momentum gives
##m_dr_d^2\omega_0= \omega_1(m_dr_d^2+m_r r_r^2)## so ## \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_1}=\frac{I_d+I_r}{I_d}##. The subscripts are 'r' for the rod and 'd' for the disc and ##I## is a moment of inertia. I'm assuming the rod and the disc have ##I=mr^2/2##.
 
ryandaly said:
The first thing that comes to my mind is to try solving it with energy, since the moments of inertia of a rod and a disc are different. Have you covered rotational kinetic energy yet?

We have, but I'm not sure how to imply it in this case without any information concerning the rod other than that it has the same mass as the disc and it is now a part of the system.
 
Mentz114 said:
Conservation of angular momentum gives
##m_dr_d^2\omega_0= \omega_1(m_dr_d^2+m_r r_r^2)## so ## \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_1}=\frac{I_d+I_r}{I_d}##. The subscripts are 'r' for the rod and 'd' for the disc and ##I## is a moment of inertia. I'm assuming the rod and the disc have ##I=mr^2/2##.

This is a very good analysis of it, and this is what I would break it down as. I simply solved it for final angular velocity or "omega 1"
 
Back
Top