Rotational Kinematics of Running

AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of revolutions a diver makes when jumping from an 8.3m cliff with an average angular speed of 1.6 rev/s, the correct approach involves using the equation s = ut + 0.5at², where the initial speed (u) is 0 and acceleration (a) is -9.8 m/s². This calculation shows that the time to fall 8.3m is approximately 1.3 seconds, not 0.85 seconds as initially assumed. Consequently, the diver would complete about 2.08 revolutions during the fall, correcting the earlier miscalculation. The mistake stemmed from incorrectly assuming constant speed rather than accounting for acceleration due to gravity. Understanding these kinematic equations is crucial for accurately solving rotational motion problems in free fall.
MetalCut
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi
I need some help.
The question is:

At the local swimming hole, a favourite trick is to run horizontally of a cliff that is 8.3m above the water. One diver runs off the edge of the cliff, tucks into a ball and rotates on the way down with an average angular speed of 1.6rev/s. Ignore air resistance and determine the number of revolutions she makes on the way down.

Now I've done it like this but the anser is wrong...


∆Ө = 1.6rev[(2 pie rad) ÷ (1 revolution)] = 10.05 radians
Well, gravity pulls her down at 9.8m/s². So in the first second she will fall 9.8m.
She only needs to fall 8.3m to the water.
So 8.3m ÷ 9.8m = 0.85s
It will take her only 0.85s to reach the water.
And she makes 1.6rev/s.
So 1.6 ÷ 100 = 0.016
Then 0.016 x 85 = 1.36
Thus she will make 1.36 revolutions on her way down.

What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
9.8ms^-2 means that the body will achieve the velocity of 9.81ms^-1 in a second, not 9.81m.
I think the equation, s=ut+0.5at^2 should be used instead.
 
You are assuming her speed was a constant 9.8 m/s which is not true.
As Harmony said, use s= ut+ 0.5at^2. Here u (initial speed) is 0 and a (acceleration) is -9.8. Since she is diving down 8.3 m, -8.3= -(0.5)(9.8)t^2.
 
Thanx alot, i don't know how i could have made such a stupid mistake...

Thanx
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top