- #1
ziggo
- 4
- 0
Good afternoon! I've been mulling over this question for a bit and I can't seem to understand what it is asking. This is a question for an introductory calculus-based physics university course.
1. The Problem:
A uniform disk, such as a record turntable, turns 8.0 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A non-rotating rod of the same mass as the disk is dropped onto the freely spinning disk so that both turn around the spindle. Determine the angular velocity of the combination in rev/s.
2. Equations used:
I interpreted this as a conservation of angular momentum problem where the radius remains constant:
m r^2 ω = m(disc and rod) r ^2 ω(final)
3. The solution:
Since the radius remains constant and the mass doubles, both the mass and radius^2 can be removed from both sides leaving:
ω(initial) = 2ω(final)
and since the initial angular velocity was 16π Rad/s the final angular velocity would be 8π Rad/s.
Am I in the ballpark here assuming that this question is concerning the conservation of angular momentum? I don't see any other way to incorporate mass other than using Newton's laws, but I'm not sure on that.
1. The Problem:
A uniform disk, such as a record turntable, turns 8.0 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A non-rotating rod of the same mass as the disk is dropped onto the freely spinning disk so that both turn around the spindle. Determine the angular velocity of the combination in rev/s.
2. Equations used:
I interpreted this as a conservation of angular momentum problem where the radius remains constant:
m r^2 ω = m(disc and rod) r ^2 ω(final)
3. The solution:
Since the radius remains constant and the mass doubles, both the mass and radius^2 can be removed from both sides leaving:
ω(initial) = 2ω(final)
and since the initial angular velocity was 16π Rad/s the final angular velocity would be 8π Rad/s.
Am I in the ballpark here assuming that this question is concerning the conservation of angular momentum? I don't see any other way to incorporate mass other than using Newton's laws, but I'm not sure on that.
Last edited: