How is Rotational Kinetic Energy Calculated for a Merry-Go-Round?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the rotational kinetic energy of a merry-go-round, the problem involves a horizontal merry-go-round with a weight of 813 N and a radius of 1.28 m, started by a constant tangential force of 66 N. The equations for weight, force, tangential velocity, angular speed, and moment of inertia for a solid cylinder are utilized in the calculations. The user initially found the tangential acceleration and subsequently calculated the tangential velocity and angular speed, leading to an attempt to compute the rotational kinetic energy. However, the final answer of 94.31353 Joules was marked incorrect, indicating a potential oversight in considering torque. The discussion emphasizes the importance of torque in the calculations for accurate results.
lgmavs41
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A horizontal 813 N merry-go-round of radius 1.28 m is started from rest by a constant horizontal force of 66 N applied tangentially to the merry-go-round. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. Assume it is a solid cylinder. Find the kinetic energy of the merry-go-round after 2.68 s.

Homework Equations


Weight = mg
F=ma
Vf=Vi + at
tangential velocity=radius*angular speed
Kr = 1/2 (moment of inertia*angular speed^2)
moment of inertia = 1/2 Mass*Radius^2 for solid cylinder

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, using the constant force applied and the weight of the merry-go-round, I found the tangential acceleration: a = F * g / weight...Then I solved for the tangential velocity with Vf = a * t since it started from rest...then I solved for the angular speed:
w = tangential velocity / radius. Then plugged all the numbers I found to solve for moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy. My final answer is 94.31353 Joules. I entered it in the computer and I got it wrong. I'm not sure where my error is. pls advice. Thanx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh. I should have considered torque...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top