Rotational Mechanics: Comparing Cylinder P & Q

AI Thread Summary
Cylinder P has a greater moment of inertia than cylinder Q because its mass is concentrated near its surface, while Q has most of its mass near the axis. The instantaneous axis of rotation for both cylinders is located at the point of contact with the inclined plane as they roll down. Both cylinders will reach the ground with the same translational kinetic energy, assuming no energy loss due to friction or air resistance. The discussion highlights the importance of mass distribution in determining rotational dynamics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing the motion of rolling objects.
joker94
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Two solid cylinders p and Q of same mass and same radius start rolling down a fixed inclinded plane from the same height at the asme time.cylinder P has most of its mass concentrated near its surface while Q HAS MOST of its mass near the axis...
THEN
1)WHICH HAS MORE MOMENT OF INERTIA AND WHY?
2)WHAT IS THE INSTANTEOUS AXIS OF ROTATION??
3)DOES BOTH CYLINDERS REACH THE GROUND WITH SAME TRANSLATIONAL KINECTIC ENERGY?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi joker94! welcome to pf! :wink:

tell us what you think, and then we'll comment! :smile:
 
hi...can we consider P as a hollow cylinder then moment of inertia about the axis(which is passing through its centre) would be MR^2...AND THEN WE CAN CONSIDER Q AS A SOLID CYLINDER HAVING MOMENT OF INERTIA MR^2/2 (^2 MEANS SQUARE AND / DIVIDE)...SO IT MEANS MOMENT OF INERTIA OF P IS MORE THAN MOMENT OF INERTIA OF Q.!
AM I CORRECT?
 
joker94 said:
hi...can we consider P as a hollow cylinder then moment of inertia about the axis(which is passing through its centre) would be MR^2...AND THEN WE CAN CONSIDER Q AS A SOLID CYLINDER HAVING MOMENT OF INERTIA MR^2/2 (^2 MEANS SQUARE AND / DIVIDE)...SO IT MEANS MOMENT OF INERTIA OF P IS MORE THAN MOMENT OF INERTIA OF Q.!
AM I CORRECT?

Right answer, though of course it would be better not to have to assume the extreme case when the original question was posed more generally.
How about your questions 2 and 3?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top