Rotational Motion of a car on a curve

AI Thread Summary
A 600 kg car navigating a banked curve with a radius of 110m at a speed of 24.5 m/s requires a specific banking angle to maintain its path without friction. The equations governing the motion involve normal force and gravitational force, leading to the relationship tan{theta} = v^2/rg when the second equation is divided by the first. This method simplifies the problem by eliminating common variables, making it easier to isolate theta. Dividing rather than multiplying is preferred for clarity and simplicity in solving for the angle. Understanding the rationale behind this algebraic manipulation is crucial for effectively applying physics principles in rotational motion.
ajmCane22
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 600 kg car is going around a banked curve with a radius of 110m at a speed of 24.5 m/s. What is the appropriate banking angle so that the car stays on its path without the assistance of friction?

Homework Equations



N cos{theta} = mg
N sin{theta} = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I was told to divide the second equation by the first equation which gives tan{theta} = v^2/rg
I used this equation and got the right answer, but I'm just wondering if somebody could please explain WHY the second equation was divided by the first and not the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ajmCane22 said:
I was told to divide the second equation by the first equation which gives tan{theta} = v^2/rg
I used this equation and got the right answer, but I'm just wondering if somebody could please explain WHY the second equation was divided by the first and not the other way around.

If you divided the first equation by the second, you would get:

cot(θ) = (gr/v2)

θ = arccot(gr/v2).

I imagine that ought to give you the right answer as well...
 
This might be a really dumb question, but why do you divide instead of multiply?
 
ajmCane22 said:
This might be a really dumb question, but why do you divide instead of multiply?

You do whatever algebraic manipulation makes it easiest to solve for theta. With N's on both lefthand sides, and m's on both righthand sides, it seems natural to get rid of both of them by dividing them out. Then you're left with something that is only in terms of theta on the lefthand side.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top