Rotational speed due to gravitational pull in earth's orbits

AI Thread Summary
In discussing the optimal orbit for achieving the highest rotational speed for a package, it is established that a lower orbit allows for greater speed due to proximity to Earth, as described by Kepler's third law. However, the significant atmospheric drag at low Earth orbit can hinder sustained orbital motion, leading to reentry rather than stable orbiting. The conversation emphasizes the need for mathematical relations that account for gravitational pull, distance, and atmospheric effects to accurately describe the scenario. Parameters such as altitude, velocity, and drag coefficients should be considered for a realistic model. Ultimately, while lower orbits provide speed advantages, they also introduce challenges that must be addressed.
y33t
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Assume we have a package that we want it in an orbit with highest possible speed. In which orbit (low,mid,high) the package will rotate faster ? Due to smaller distance, low Earth orbit should allow more speed but there is also more air friction there. What would be the mathematical relation to derive rotational speed dependent on other variables? What kind of parameters should be introduced for a more realistic description of the problem?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question does not belong in special and general relativity. Classical physics is more than capable of answering this question, which is where I have moved this thread.

The answer is simple: Lower. Kepler's third law.

What if the object gets so low that atmospheric drag becomes significant? Simple: The object is no longer orbiting. It's reentering the Earth's atmosphere.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top