Rotational stability of an m&m

AI Thread Summary
When spinning peanut butter M&M's around their minor axis, they initially rotate until reaching a certain velocity, then shift to spinning around their major axis before stabilizing back to the minor axis as they slow down. This behavior occurs due to the wobble that creates a circular trace at the point of contact, generating a torque that helps right the candy. Unlike a sphere, which lacks a major and minor axis, a quarter can exhibit similar behavior if spun rapidly. The interplay of gravitational torque and the torque from the point of contact allows the M&M to return to a stable orientation. This phenomenon highlights the unique rotational dynamics of asymmetric objects like M&M's compared to symmetrical ones.
ailijic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was bored at work and started spinning m&m's, specifically peanut butter m&m's.

If I spin the candy about its minor axis it will rotate about said axis until it reaches a certain velocity and then will rotate and start spinning about its major axis and then as it slows it will rotate back down to the minor axis and come to rest to the logical and most stable orientation.

Why does this happen?
How is it different than a rotating sphere or say a quarter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you spin the m&m, it's going to wobble a bit. In your imagination, keep track of the point of contact between the m&m and the table. When you spin the m&m on its minor axis, a little wobble makes the point of contact trace out a circle. At every point on that circle, there is a force on that part of the m&m that is directed toward the center, which acts as a torque on the m&m. Granted, gravity acting on the center of mass of the m&m is another torque in the opposite direction, but, as you have experienced, that can be overcome if you spin the m&m fast enough. Essentially, the center of contact is pulled to the center, and the m&m is righted. Once it looses enough energy, it will fall back down.

How is this different from a sphere or quarter?
Well, a sphere has no major/minor axis, so this won't happen with a sphere, but it can happen with a quarter! You'd have to spin it really fast, though.
 
Last edited:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top