Row Reduction over indicated field

ur5pointos2sl
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hi-

I am taking linear algebra and the teacher threw some problems at us that I cannot seem to figure out or find examples for online. Also, the textbook doesn't even cover the material.

The problem states:
Using Gauss-Jordan elimination, solve the following system with coefficients in indicated field.

In Z3:

2x + y = 1
x + y = 2

Now I understand completely how to row reduce this system, but am not sure how to proceed in Z3.

Any help appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best thing to do here is to solve the system as you normally would and then interpret the solution in \mathbb{Z}_3.

So, how would you proceed normally?? Just write the first step, don't solve it completely yet.
 
Thanks for the reply.

The first thing I would do is swap row 1 and row 2 to get a leading 1 in row 1.

[1 1 l 2]
[2 1 l 1]

From here would take R2-2R1.
 
OK, so do R2-2R1. But be aware that the arithmetic is in \mathbb{Z}_3.

So, for example, the second column gives us 1-2*1=-1=2.
 
or, (to keep it straight as you go) realize that -2 in Z3 is actually 1, so instead of R2-2R1, use R2+R1 (which gives you 3 = 0 in the first column).

that is, instead of aiming to "zero out" entries, you just want to get them to the nearest multiple of 3 (which amounts to the same thing in Z3). with a little practice, you can see how to do this and always keep all the entries positive, which might help a bit.
 
micromass said:
OK, so do R2-2R1. But be aware that the arithmetic is in \mathbb{Z}_3.

So, for example, the second column gives us 1-2*1=-1=2.

Deveno said:
or, (to keep it straight as you go) realize that -2 in Z3 is actually 1, so instead of R2-2R1, use R2+R1 (which gives you 3 = 0 in the first column).

that is, instead of aiming to "zero out" entries, you just want to get them to the nearest multiple of 3 (which amounts to the same thing in Z3). with a little practice, you can see how to do this and always keep all the entries positive, which might help a bit.

Thanks for the reply. The part I don't understand is how -1 = 2 and -2 = 1 in Z3. Would you be able to explain this part to me?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top