Rsoft BeamProp software - redeem my misery!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fiber Simulation
AI Thread Summary
The user is experiencing difficulties with Rsoft BeamProp simulation software while trying to divide a multi-core fiber design into regions along the z-axis, as the software only allows division of the middle core. They seek advice from the community for solutions. A suggestion was made to explore Synopsys Support and their online forums for assistance, though the user noted that those forums are not very active. The user is also interested in engaging in friendly discussions about Rsoft BeamProp and RP FiberPower software. Overall, the thread highlights a need for support and community interaction regarding simulation challenges.
Haia
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi everyone!:)
I'm Having a rough time with Rsoft BeamProp simulation software, I am simulating an multi-core fiber with my own specific design and am trying to divide the fiber into regions (in z axis) - the software would only let me divide a specific core (and more specifically the middle core). Is there anyone here than can advice me ?
Thanks a lot!:smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for replying!:)
Their forums aren't so active...I might try watching their recordings so thanks!
Anyway I am looking for friendly and professional conversations about this software and RP FiberPower software
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top