Energy Eigenstates and Degeneracy: Proving Non-Commuting Observables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that energy eigenstates are generally degenerate when two non-commuting observables commute with the Hamiltonian. The relationship between the Hamiltonian and the observables is established through their action on the eigenstates, leading to the conclusion that the eigenvalues associated with the observables must be equal, indicating degeneracy. The example of the central-force problem illustrates this concept using angular momentum operators. The participant expresses uncertainty about identifying exceptions to this degeneracy condition. Overall, the proof demonstrates that the non-commuting nature of the observables contributes to the degeneracy of energy eigenstates.
Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two observables A_1 and A_2, which do not involve time explicitly, are known not to commute,

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

Yet they both commute with the Hamiltonian:

\left[A_1,H\right]=0
\left[A_2,H\right]=0

Prove that they energy eigenstates are, in general, degenerate.

Are there exceptions?

As an example, you may think of the central-force problem H=\frac{\textbf{p}^2}{2m}+V\left(r\right) with A_1 \rightarrow L_z, A_2 \rightarrow L_x

The Attempt at a Solution



If the Hamiltonian operates on the ket, we get:

H|n\rangle = E_n|n\rangle

If the A_n operates operate on the ket:

A_n|n\rangle = a_n|n\rangle

If the Hamiltonian operates on that:

H\left(A_n|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_n|n\rangle\right)

So:

H\left(A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1|n\rangle\right)
H\left(A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2|n\rangle\right)

These are non-degenerate, because a_1\ne a_2

Given this:

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

That means A_1A_2-A_2A_1\ne 0

Which means A_1A_2 \ne A_2A_1

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle = a_1a_2|n\rangle

And

A_2A_1|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

However: a_1a_2=a_2a_1, so

a_1a_2|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle \ne A_2A_1|n\rangle

Now

H\left(A_1A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right)

And

H\left(A_2A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

So

E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

And therefore they are degenerate.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
But I'm not really sure how to find an exception.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top