Same Speed for Ball Thrown from Moving Car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hepic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Speed
Hepic
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
We have two people. A person(A) that is stadning and another(B) one who drives his car,so he has some velocitty. Let's say that the person B throw a photon from his car. Let's suppose that photon will hit down and will go up again. So both guys see the same speed.
But If instead of light,he throw a ball then both will see the same speed for the ball always?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, there is a unique invariant speed, which we call the speed of light. According to relativity, there is one formula that covers all cases such as you describe:

Suppose B is moving at v relative to A. Suppose A throws 'something' at velocity u as measured by A. Then B sees the 'something' moving at:

(u-v)/ (1 - uv/c^2)

If you put u=c, you get c also for what B sees. For any other value of u, you get a different speed as observed by B. for u much less than c, this formula becomes empirically indistinguishable from u-v. But it is one formula for all cases.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
87
Views
11K
Replies
42
Views
649
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
83
Views
8K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top