Satelite how far from center of earth?

AI Thread Summary
A satellite in a circular parking orbit 6.98x10^6 m from Earth is set to initiate a Hohmann transfer by increasing its speed to 8300 m/s. The discussion focuses on determining how far from the center of Earth the satellite will be at its apogee after this velocity change. Key considerations include the relationship between orbit parameters, energy, and angular momentum, as well as the direction of the thrust applied. The satellite's new velocity, if perpendicular to its radial position vector, will define its new orbit, with the point of closest approach being its perigee. The potential energy calculation provided is based on the mass of Earth and the new speed, indicating progress in solving the problem.
ChinToka
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This problem troubles me since three days and I don´t know a way to solve it:

A satelite is in a circular parking orbit 6.98x10^6m from Earth. To initiate a Hohmann transfer, a rocket gives it an accelerating thrust so that its speed is increased to 8300m/s. How far from the center of Earth will the satelite be when it reaches its apogee?

What I need is the formula(s) so I can do it by myself
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChinToka said:
This problem troubles me since three days and I don´t know a way to solve it:

A satelite is in a circular parking orbit 6.98x10^6m from Earth. To initiate a Hohmann transfer, a rocket gives it an accelerating thrust so that its speed is increased to 8300m/s. How far from the center of Earth will the satelite be when it reaches its apogee?

What I need is the formula(s) so I can do it by myself
I'm not going to quote the formulas, but if you are learning about elliptical orbits you should know something about the connection between orbit parameters and the energy and angular momentum of a satellite. You are given enough information to find the energy, speed, radius, and angular momentum for the circular orbit. I am assuming the thrust is directed tangent to this orbit, but you need to veryify that. I also assume that the velocity change will be nearly instantaneous so that the new velocity will be perpendicular to the radial position vector. The new speed will have an associated total energy and angular mometum that will determine the shape of the new orbit.

If the new velocity is, as I suspect, perpendicular to the radial postion vector to the satellite, it will be the highest velocity the satellite ever achieves, and the location of the satellite immediately after the velocity increase will be the point of closest approach in its new orbit. In other words the satellite will be at perigee. It may be that "Hohmann transfer" implies some constraint on the direction of the new velocity. It is not something I am familiar with. If the new velocity is not perpendicular to the position vector, it will may more difficult to find the new angular momentum. However, once you have found the new angular momentum and energy you have what you need to determine the orbit parameters.
 
Let´s check if I have the right formulas

Energy: My guess is that the satelite has potential energy P_E=1/2mv^2
Speed: I don´t have a clue :cry: I don´t think s=d/t is the right one
Radius: w=2pi/T
Angular Momentum: L=I*w

So the potential energy would be 1/2(5.97x10^24)(8300)^2 = 2.0563665x10^32J

Am I right so far?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top