Satellite angle, remote sensing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the incidence angle of a geostationary satellite observing a region at 60°N 0°E. The solution involves determining the scan angle (β) and the incidence angle (γin) using trigonometric relationships, specifically γin = 90° − (φ + β). Participants express confusion about the derivation of certain equations and the relationships between angles in the context of a geometric diagram. The importance of a well-drawn figure for clarity in understanding the geometry is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of remote sensing calculations and the need for precise visual aids.
Firben
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have a geostationary satellite (location 0◦N 0◦E, 36000 km above geoid). Assume the Earth to be spherical with a radius of REarth = 6372km

When observing a region centered at 60◦N 0◦E:

What is the incidence angle of the satellite’s line of sight (at pixel center; surface parallel≡ 0 ◦ , nadir≡ 90◦ )?

Homework Equations


φ = 60◦
r = 6370 km

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
http://s716.photobucket.com/user/Pitoraq/media/Rs_zpstcj5qby5.png.html?sort=3&o=0

Im not sure how to calculate the angle of incidence by that figure. This is from an exam and the solution is:

b = r × sin φ = 5517 km
a = r − r × cos φ = 3185 km
scan-angle (off nadir) β: tan β = b/(h+a) = 5517/(36000+3185) = 0.1408, β = 8.014◦
parallel surface: 90◦ − φ = 30◦
incidence-angle: γin = 90◦ − (φ + β) = 21.99◦

where do they get the relation 90◦ − φ = 30◦ from ? and where is β in my figure ?


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
β is the acute angle on the far right of your sketch.
 
But where do they get the relation γin = 90◦ − (φ + β) = 21.99◦ from ?
 
I got the answer by using the sinus law (v = 21.9). But what about the mean horizontal resolution in direction, respectively (in km)? You might assume the Earth to be locally flat.
If i call the right side of the figure d,then d is = 41639 km
The answer is:
tan α(lon) × d × 2 = 2.89 km
Why did they add those terms together ?
 
Firben said:
But where do they get the relation γin = 90◦ − (φ + β) = 21.99◦ from ?
From there being 180° in a ∆. Your diagram is too small; you need a large, neatly drawn figure that is so spacious that you can imagine yourself walking around in it----that's how I view geometry.
γin needs to be shown measured against a tangent to the Earth's surface, so there's your 90° between a radius and that tangent.
 
Yes, i saw it when i plotted a new figure. But where do the relation tan α(lon) × d × 2 = 2.89 km came from ?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top