Satellite Motion Homework: Find 2nd Satellite Speed

AI Thread Summary
A satellite is in a circular orbit with a speed of 1.70 × 10^4 m/s and a radius of 5.25 × 10^6 m, while a second satellite orbits at a radius of 8.60 × 10^6 m. The calculations for the second satellite's speed using the formula v = sqrt(GM/r) resulted in an answer of 1.3 × 10^4 m/s, which was questioned due to a discrepancy with the expected answer of 1.3 × 10^-7 m/s. The discussion suggests that the mass of the planet was calculated correctly, but there may be an issue with the answer key or the interpretation of the orbital speeds. The numerical factor of 1.3 was noted to match, indicating a potential typo in the answer key. The participants agree that the order of magnitude for both satellites should be similar.
ThePiGeek314
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satellite is in a circular orbit around an unknown planet. The satellite has a speed of 1.70 × 104 m/s, and the radius of the orbit is 5.25 × 106 m. A second satellite also has a circular orbit around this same planet. The orbit of this second satellite has a radius of 8.60 × 106 m. What is the speed of the second satellite?

Homework Equations



Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion -- T2/r3 = 4pi2 / GM

v = sqrt (GM / r)

The Attempt at a Solution



There really isn't much conceptual work involved in this, so I might just be making an arithmetic mistake somewhere. But I've worked the problem out three times and gotten the same (wrong) answer every time...

I used the v = sqrt (GM / r) -- plugged the values in for the first satellite and solved for the planet's mass which must be 2.274 x 1025 kg.

Then I used that mass value for M in the same equation, switching out the radius value for the second satellite. I get that v = 1.3 x 104.

But the answer is 1.3 x 10-7.

Why is my answer so far off? Is the problem with the planet mass value or just in the calculations for the second satellite's speed? I think my process is right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ThePiGeek314 said:
But the answer is 1.3 x 10-7.
This is clearly a typo in the answer key. There's no way orbital speed just barely higher would be 11 orders of magnitude lower.
The numerical factor of 1.3 matches, so you're good there, and by eyeballing the distances involved the order of magnitude should be the same for both satellites - i.e. 10E4.
 
Thanks! I did wonder about the small difference in the orbit radii, but wasn't sure if I was missing something.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top