Satellite orbit question: does mass affect this problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the height of a 540 kg synchronous satellite in a circular orbit above the Earth's equator. The calculations yield a height of approximately 35,920 km above the Earth's surface, confirming that the mass of the satellite does not significantly affect this result. While the equations used assume the Earth is stationary, a more detailed analysis would include the combined mass of both the Earth and the satellite, which would affect the orbital period. However, given the vast difference in mass between the Earth and the satellite, this effect is negligible for practical purposes. Ultimately, the mass of the satellite is not a critical factor in determining its geosynchronous orbit.
N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I think I have an answer for the following problem, but I'm not sure if it (or the assumptions used to get it) are correct:

Consider a 540 kg synchronous satellite in a circular orbit in the same plane as our equator. Find the height H of the satellite above the Earth's equator.


What I got:

msat - mass of satellite = 540 kg
mearth - mass of Earth = 5.98 x 10^24 kg
r = radius = distance between Earth's center and the satellite = r
G = 6.67 x 10^-11 (N m^2 / kg^2)
v = velocity of the satellite
a = acceleration for uniform circular motion
radius Earth = 6380 km


F = ma
a = v^2 / r

G (msat * mearth) / r^2 = msat ( v^2 / r )

v = (2*pi*r) / T

T = 1 day = 86,400 seconds

substituting...and cancelling msat on both sides

G (mearth / r^2 ) = (2*pi*r)^2 / (r T^2 )

Re-arranging...

r^3 = ( G*mearth*T^2 ) / (4*pi^2)

r^3 = 7.54 x 10^22 meters cubed.

r = 4.23 X 10^7 meters or 42,300 km


total radius - Earth radius = height above the Earth's surface

42,300 km - 6,380 km = 35,920 km or 35,920,000 meters above the Earth's surface
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass does not affect it.

I got the same answer as you. Google also has the same answer.
 
Thank you.
 
Since you did ask whether "mass affects this problem," you should know that the equations you set up assume that mass doesn't matter by taking the Earth to be stationary. If you were to do the problem a little more carefully, the Earth and the satellite would revolve about their center of mass.

You would then find that the mass appearing in the equation you wrote for the period would contain the combined mass of the Earth and satellite (instead of just the Earth's mass) so then, yes, the mass of the satellite contributes to the period.

Of course, for the problem at hand, the mass of the satellite is so small compared with the mass of the Earth that the difference it makes in calculating the geosynchronous radius is entirely negligible.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top