Satellite Orbiting: Speed, Period, Altitude Calc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter squeak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed, period, and altitude of a 240 kg satellite in a circular orbit 610 km above Earth, considering energy loss during its revolutions. The initial energy is represented as U = GMm/r + h, but confusion arises regarding the factor of one-half in the total energy equation, which includes both kinetic and potential energy. The specific mechanical energy formula is provided, emphasizing the relationship between velocity and orbital radius. Participants clarify that the total mechanical energy is derived from the sum of kinetic and potential energies. The conversation concludes with an understanding of the energy calculations necessary for determining the satellite's parameters.
squeak
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the speed and the period of a 240 kg satellite in an approximately circular orbit 610 km above the surface of Earth. The radius and mass of Earth are RE = 6400 km and ME = 6.0 × 1024 kg respectively. [5 marks]

Suppose the satellite loses mechanical energy at the average rate of 1.7 × 105 J per orbital revolution. Adopting the reasonable approximation that the satellite’s orbit becomes a circle of slowly diminishing radius, determine the satellites altitude, speed and period at the end of its 1500th revolution. What is the magnitude of the average retarding force on the satellite? [8 marks]

Homework Equations


U = -GMm/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm happy with how to do the first part of the question.
However the second part I'm struggling with.
I have ΔE = 1.7 x 105 x 1500
I then think that the energy of the satellite initially = U = GMm/r+h where h is distance from Earth surface
energy final = GMm/r + hf. This is where I have a problem as the worked solution I have been given states that Einitial = -½ GMm/r+h.
Can anyone explain why its multiplied by half?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
squeak said:
Can anyone explain why its multiplied by half?
The total energy comprises both the kinetic and potential energy of the object in orbit.

Suppose you let ##\mu = G M##, and let R be radius of the orbit. m is the mass of the orbiting object. Then the total specific mechanical energy is:

##ξ = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{μ}{r}##

Note: Multiply the specific mechanical energy by the mass m of the body to get the total mechanical energy in joules.

But the velocity of a body in circular orbit is given by ##v = \sqrt{\frac{μ}{R}}##. Make the substitution for v in the specific mechanical energy formula.
 
gneill said:
The total energy comprises both the kinetic and potential energy of the object in orbit.

Suppose you let ##\mu = G M##, and let R be radius of the orbit. m is the mass of the orbiting object. Then the total specific mechanical energy is:

##ξ = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{μ}{r}##

Note: Multiply the specific mechanical energy by the mass m of the body to get the total mechanical energy in joules.

But the velocity of a body in circular orbit is given by ##v = \sqrt{\frac{μ}{R}}##. Make the substitution for v in the specific mechanical energy formula.
Thank you so much. That all makes sense now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top