Satellite pedigree/apogee ratio. 2 values given both __Earth radii

  • Thread starter Thread starter bharminder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Satellite
AI Thread Summary
A satellite in a noncircular orbit has an apogee of 3.6 Earth radii and a perigee of 2.7 Earth radii. The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of gravitational potential energy at these two points, defined as Upedigree/Uapogee. Participants suggest using the gravitational potential energy formula, U = (G m1 m2) / r, despite lacking specific mass values. There is confusion regarding the terminology, particularly the incorrect use of "pedigree" instead of "perigee." The problem is considered non-trivial, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of gravitational potential energy in orbital mechanics.
bharminder
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A satellite is placed in a noncircular orbit about the Earth. The farthest point of its orbit (apogee) is 3.6 Earth radii from the center of the Earth, while its nearest point (perigee) is 2.7 Earth radii from the Earth's center. If we define the gravitational potential energy U to be zero for an infinite separation of Earth and satellite, find the ratio

Upedigree
Uapogee
.


I tried 3.6 Earth radii / 2.7 Earth radii and put 1.3 as the ratio. Then i tried the other way around with 2.7 / 3.6. I looked in my textbook and there is no explanation for this type of problem. I know the equation for gravitational potential energy ( U = (G m1 m2) / r

but I don't have either mass.


Bobby
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try write up the division anyway using the unknown masses and see what happens.

And please make your spell checker stop replacing perigee with pedigree :)
 
The other way round

but this is not even a level question
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top