Saving Energy on Long-Distance Flights: Calculating Mass Impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter akatsafa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Plane
AI Thread Summary
An airline executive aims to save energy and fuel on long-distance flights by removing paint from planes, which has a mass of 100 kg. To calculate energy savings, gravitational potential energy for lifting the paint to 29,000 meters is determined using the formula ΔE_grav = mgΔh, resulting in approximately 28.4 MJ saved. For the kinetic energy savings when accelerating the paint to cruising speed, the formula ΔE_k = 1/2 mv^2 is applied, leading to the conclusion that energy savings can be calculated based on the paint's mass and speed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct equations for gravitational potential and kinetic energy. Accurate calculations can significantly impact fuel efficiency in aviation.
akatsafa
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
An airline executive decides to economize by reducing the energy, and thus the amount of fuel, required forlong distance flights. He orders the ground crew to remove the paint from the outer surface of each plane. The paint removed from a single plane has mass 100 kg. (a) If the airplane cruises at an elevation of 29000m, how much energy is saved in not having to lift the paint to that altitude? (b) How much energy is saved per airplane by not having to move the amount of paint from rest to a cruising speed of 230m/s?

I tried these and got 56.84MJ and 31.07MJ, but these are not right. I used the equation E=K+U. I solved for K and then for U, but it's not right. Any suggestions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
akatsafa said:
An airline executive decides to economize by reducing the energy, and thus the amount of fuel, required forlong distance flights. He orders the ground crew to remove the paint from the outer surface of each plane. The paint removed from a single plane has mass 100 kg. (a) If the airplane cruises at an elevation of 29000m, how much energy is saved in not having to lift the paint to that altitude? (b) How much energy is saved per airplane by not having to move the amount of paint from rest to a cruising speed of 230m/s?

I tried these and got 56.84MJ and 31.07MJ, but these are not right. I used the equation E=K+U. I solved for K and then for U, but it's not right. Any suggestions?

Thanks.
I don't know why you'd use that equation. In lifting something, you give it gravitational potential energy. To give it energy, you have to use energy. The energy you use is the energy it gains. Now, the energy you save by not having to lift the paint is the energy that 100kg of paint would have gained if you had lifted it. Calculate the gravitational potential energy increase for 100kg of paint being raised that distance.

\Delta E_{grav} = mg\Delta h = (100kg)(9.81 J/kg\cdot m)(29000m) = 28.4 MJ

For part (b), you use a similar idea, except this time it is the translational kinetic energy which changes. Paint at rest has zero kinetic energy. Paint moving has some. So for it to have that energy, you've exerted energy to speed it up, so if you remove the paint, the energy saved is the energy it would have needed to speed up to that speed.

\Delta E_{k} = E'_{k} - E_{k}

Where E'_{k} is the final kinetic energy (after speeding up) and E_{k} is the initial kinetic energy (at rest).

\Delta E_{k} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 - 0

You can figure that out.
 
Thank you. I had those equations written down too, but I thought it was a harder question than it really was. Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top