Clarifying Boundary Conditions and Scalar Field Quantization in QFT

vaibhavtewari
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
This commmunity has so many nice people, so helpful, I am learning QFT from Srednicki

I would be glad if some one can clarify, all the books talk about boundary conditions which are finite at spatial infinity and give the general solution for canonical quantization of scalar field,

1) how can we apply any particular boundary condition ?

2) when we write \phi(x) in terms of creation and annihilation operator what do we mean by \phi(x)|0\rangle, I mean what do we get ? \phi(x) which is lorentz invariant scalar field and not an operator field, but then how can we get a scalar field by creating and Annihilation particles.

3) what is the value for x|0\rangle, we can do that for quantum harmonic oscillator can we do it similarly for scalar field ?

Please help me clarify these doubts
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) "classical limit"

2) psi on vacuum gives a linear combination of particle and antiparticle state, psi = a + a^dagger (in principle)

3) x is not a quantum field operator... recall that we go from x to psi, we don't have position as an operator anymore but just as label... read your srednicki again, first chapter :) :) :)
 
Thankyou for explaining, after getting up from 2 week of illness I understood most of it :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top