Scalar Functions Explained - 65 characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssrtac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Scalar
ssrtac
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
scalar functions :(

First of all I'm sorry for posting new thread about for this simple topic.
I know scalars are quantities that are fully described by a magnitude or numerical values.

For example i setx related scalar function and named it f(x) suppose that f(x)=5
and how about if i want to set 2-dimensional scalar function? Can we say f(x,y)=5 is scalar function? May anyone exemplify me x-related and (x,y)-related scalar functions?

Thanks in advance have a nice day.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Yes, sometimes f(x,y,z,t) would be called a scalar field.
 


DaleSpam said:
Yes, sometimes f(x,y,z,t) would be called a scalar field.

ok thanks:)

now , i have a question about vectors.. if AxB=AxC
then is it right to say that B=C ?

(where A,B,C are three vectors)
 


Not necessarily. For example let C=B + A. AxA=0.
 


mathman said:
Not necessarily. For example let C=B + A. AxA=0.

wow! thank you so much.

with my best regards
sertac
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
10K
Back
Top