Scalars and Vectors: The Difference

magu1re
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey. :)

I have just come onto working with vectors in pure mathematics and have no problems calculating with them. However, I do not really understand the difference between a vector and a scalar.

A scalar has magnitude only.

A vector has magnitude and direction.

Since trying to satisfy myself of the difference between these two objects, I have learned that scalars can be real numbers and are related to the operation of scaling a vector.

-7 is a scalar quantity althought it appears, to me at least, to be directed. I have been told that the negative is an indication of sense rather than direcition but this is a source of confusion for me. The magnitude of a scalar makes sense when I think of it as a vector. It seems to me as though it is a one-dimensional vector.

Would someone please clarify the difference between a scalar and a vector or provide any comments that could clear up this confusion?

Thank-you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, every scalar can be seen as a 1-dimensional vector.

Formally, scalars are elements of a field, say the reals R. A vector space over R is a group on which R acts; its elements are by definition called 'vectors'.

But R itself is a 1-dimensional vector space over R. In this sense, elements of R are both scalars (elements of the field R) and vectors (elements of the 1-dimensional vector space R over R).

(7 and -7 have opposite orientation. If we want to say that -7 has "negative direction", we are actually presuming an orientation on R. But that's a somewhat more advanced concept. )
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Back
Top