Scattering theory - phase shift - best approx.

Hi all,

we're looking at scattering theory in the QM course right now, and I've got a question concerning the approximative ways of calculating the phase shift [tex]\delta_l[/tex] of the partial waves in the partial wave expansion of the scattered wave.

One way (the semi-classical) to calculate it is through
[tex] \delta_l = \int^{r}_{r_0} k(r')dr' - kr [/tex],
where [tex]r_0[/tex] is the "border" of the classically allowed area for the particle(s) and [tex]k(r)[/tex] is the "local" wave number (right choice of word :confused:).

The other way is through the 1st order Born approximation:
[tex]-\frac{tan ~\delta_l}{k} = <u^0_l | U | u^0_l> [/tex]

Now if I remember right the second method was presented as the for sure prefered one. My question is: how's that?. How can we be sure that this is the best way. The clue might be that the first is (semi-) classical, but on the other hand it seems quite rough to just use the [tex]u_l[/tex] of a free particle, that is [tex]u_l^0[/tex]. It must be very depending on the kind of scattering potential we're dealing with, or?


The criterion for the validity of the Born approximation is
\frac{m | V_0 | a^2}{\hbar^2} \ll 1
where ##m## is the mass of the particle, ##V_0## and ##a## the height and range of the potential, respectively. Therefore, if this condition is met, then the Born approximation is a good approximation, and the result will be better than using a semi-classical approximation. One can also go further and use the second Born approximation to refine the result.

Want to reply to this thread?

"Scattering theory - phase shift - best approx." You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads