Scattering theory - phase shift - best approx.

jonas_nilsson

Hi all,

we're looking at scattering theory in the QM course right now, and I've got a question concerning the approximative ways of calculating the phase shift $$\delta_l$$ of the partial waves in the partial wave expansion of the scattered wave.

One way (the semi-classical) to calculate it is through
$$\delta_l = \int^{r}_{r_0} k(r')dr' - kr$$,
where $$r_0$$ is the "border" of the classically allowed area for the particle(s) and $$k(r)$$ is the "local" wave number (right choice of word ).

The other way is through the 1st order Born approximation:
$$-\frac{tan ~\delta_l}{k} = <u^0_l | U | u^0_l>$$

Now if I remember right the second method was presented as the for sure prefered one. My question is: how's that?. How can we be sure that this is the best way. The clue might be that the first is (semi-) classical, but on the other hand it seems quite rough to just use the $$u_l$$ of a free particle, that is $$u_l^0$$. It must be very depending on the kind of scattering potential we're dealing with, or?

Related Quantum Physics News on Phys.org

DrClaude

Mentor
The criterion for the validity of the Born approximation is
$$\frac{m | V_0 | a^2}{\hbar^2} \ll 1$$
where $m$ is the mass of the particle, $V_0$ and $a$ the height and range of the potential, respectively. Therefore, if this condition is met, then the Born approximation is a good approximation, and the result will be better than using a semi-classical approximation. One can also go further and use the second Born approximation to refine the result.

"Scattering theory - phase shift - best approx."

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving