Schools Schools recognizing grade inflations or deflations

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perceived differences in grading standards and GPA significance between various colleges and their impact on graduate school admissions. It highlights that while schools recognize the varying difficulty of achieving similar GPAs across institutions, they may not prioritize minor GPA differences, such as between a 3.8 and a 3.9. However, significant GPA gaps, like between a 2.5 and a 3.5, are viewed more critically, as a lower GPA suggests serious academic struggles regardless of the institution's reputation. The conversation also touches on how grading practices vary, with some prestigious schools like MIT employing strict grading and curving policies, which can influence how grades are interpreted by admissions committees. Ultimately, the consensus is that students from less prestigious schools need to maintain strong grades to enhance their chances for graduate school, as lower GPAs can adversely affect their applications.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1
I know a lot of schools recognize that it is definitely easier to get a 90% in College A than it is in College B. The 96% in College C may only worth 70% in College D.

But my question is, despite knowing these facts, do school really care? Like they know this, but how much do they care?

Now I know, when it comes to "big admissions", a lot of other things are considered.

But when it comes down to it, are all the 3.8GPA people's application cast away and only the 3.9GPA (or 4.0GPA) people's app get a chance to be glanced at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flyingpig said:
But when it comes down to it, are all the 3.8GPA people's application cast away and only the 3.9GPA (or 4.0GPA) people's app get a chance to be glanced at?

Physics graduate admissions committees generally do not care about the difference between 3.8 and 3.9 because there are just too many differences between schools to make that comparison useful.

They *do* care about the difference between a 2.5 and 3.5. because the belief is that if you got a 2.5, it doesn't matter where you went, you seriously messed up some way and some how.
 
Also some of this comes to branding. For example, if you get a 2.8 from MIT, the fact that you managed to survived MIT at all is going to help you. Also the undergraduate programs often adjust things to fit graduate admissions. MIT for example, grades tests brutally, but they adjust things so that the transcripts says an A, even though the highest test is typically 60-70%. Harvard curves everything so that the grades are rather inflated.
 
I thought prestige of your undergrad institution never even comes to their minds...

What do you mean MIT grade tests brutally? I saw the open course ware exams, they weren't very difficult, do they take serious marks off for like sig figs? I mean compare to the exams in my college...
 
flyingpig said:
I thought prestige of your undergrad institution never even comes to their minds...

It's not so much prestige, but that some schools have reputations for being nastier than others.

What do you mean MIT grade tests brutally? I saw the open course ware exams, they weren't very difficult, do they take serious marks off for like sig figs? I mean compare to the exams in my college...

They take serious marks off for everything.
 
It's not so much prestige, but that some schools have reputations for being nastier than others.

But what if I don't go to a prestige school...? I mean MIT actually CURVES their exams, many don't...like mine.
 
Flyingpig, you have posted a zillion threads with the theme "my grades aren't so good; please tell me this won't hurt my chances for graduate school." I'm sorry, but they will hurt your chances for graduate school.

You need to get your grades up. If you are truly passionate about science, you will find a way.
 
Back
Top