Schrodinger Equation: No Higher Powers of ψ

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
ψ and its derivatives occur only linearly in the Schrodinger equation, that is, second or higher powers of these quantities do not appear in the equation.
Schrodinger equation for a free particle is
i\hbar∂ψ(x,t)/∂t = (-\hbar2/2m)(∂2ψ(x,t)/∂x2)
Here (∂2ψ(x,t)/∂x2) is second power of ψ. Then how can we justify the statement "second or higher powers of ψ do not appear"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the second derivative. The statement "linear" means no terms like (dψ/dx)^2 or ψ^2 appear.
 
To follow that up, the key issue with the equation being linear is that if two wave functions are possible solutions (like two plane waves in your example), then any linear superposition of them is also a solution. This gives us the concept of "wave packets", and is important in a lot of quantum mechanics.
 
Thanks for your replies Matterwave and Ken G
 
logearav said:
ψ and its derivatives occur only linearly in the Schrodinger equation, that is, second or higher powers of these quantities do not appear in the equation.
Schrodinger equation for a free particle is
i\hbar∂ψ(x,t)/∂t = (-\hbar2/2m)(∂2ψ(x,t)/∂x2)
Here (∂2ψ(x,t)/∂x2) is second power of ψ. Then how can we justify the statement "second or higher powers of ψ do not appear"?

The Schrödinger equation is a differential linear equation in ψ.

For a free particle it is

i\hbar∂/∂t ψ = K ψ

Since it is linear this means that if ψ1 and ψ2 are solutions, then any linear combination ψT = c1ψ1 + c2ψ2 is a solution as well.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top