Schrodinger equation solution when U>E

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



see attachment

Homework Equations


TISE

The Attempt at a Solution


a)When U>E
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\Psi(x,t)}{d x^2}+U(x)\Psi(x)=E\Psi(x)
leads to blahblahblah...(there is only transmittion no reflection as x to infty)
\Psi(x)=Be^{-\alpha x}, where \alpha = \sqrt\frac{2m[U(x)-E]}{\hbar^2}This is the solution i work out, but how to "demostrate" it is a solution?

b)
Actually i don't know 2nd order ODE, so i try here:
when U<E, there will be reflection and incident part:
so \Psi(x)=Ae^{+i\beta x}+Be^{-i\beta x},where\beta =\sqrt\frac{2m[E-U(x)]}{\hbar^2}or\beta =\sqrt\frac{2m[U(x)-E]}{\hbar^2}?
but in any case, the exponential is "complex", yielding the Cosine function,(but where does sine go?)?So U<E there?

c)from part b, \beta=10^{9}
but i don't know whether \alpha =\beta ??
but i just assume so and i calculate: U-E=5.56^-21 J
I would appreciate it if you could help me out esp. the question mark part. Thx!
 

Attachments

  • phy.jpg
    phy.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 469
Physics news on Phys.org
Well put it in the equation and see it it will give you something useful (usually if you put the solution in an equation, the condition set on it will be satisfied...).

See the i in the exponentials. If you rewrite them you'll get something real and something imaginary, right? And what does an imaginary solution means in the real world? :D

See what the conditions must be satisfied when solving Schrodinger. And then try to see how they affect your solutions :)

I'm sure that exist in Griffiths or similar books...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top