Schrodinger's Equation & Measurement

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Hi there,

Ok, so if you know the interactions, etc., you can calculate from time0 the probabilities for certain results at say time8.

But say, however, we perform a measurement before time8. Will the original predictions for time8 still hold if a measurement is performed prior to that time? Or will it be different - in that case, what information do you need from the measurement, to plug into the unitary operator (which will include interactions, etc.) to find the new probabilities at time8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StevieTNZ said:
Hi there,

Ok, so if you know the interactions, etc., you can calculate from time0 the probabilities for certain results at say time8.

But say, however, we perform a measurement before time8. Will the original predictions for time8 still hold if a measurement is performed prior to that time? Or will it be different - in that case, what information do you need from the measurement, to plug into the unitary operator (which will include interactions, etc.) to find the new probabilities at time8?

The wave equation can be set up to be as complicated or simple as you like. It is possible to include variation of the equation over time, or make the simplifying assumption that nothing varies over time. It is up to you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Back
Top