Schroedinger's equation with positive energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matthew888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Positive
Matthew888
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a particle (which mass is m) and the following unidimensional potential:

V(x)=\begin{cases}+\infty & x<0\\ -V_0 & 0<x<a\\0 & x>a \end{cases}

Let E be positive. Find the spatial autofunction.

Homework Equations


I'm convinced that I have to use Schroedinger's equation.


The Attempt at a Solution


I found:
\psi(x)=\begin{cases} 0 & x<0 \\ A\sin{lx}+B\cos{lx} & 0<x<a\\ C\exp{ikx}+D\exp{-ikx} & x>a\end{cases}
where k=\frac{\sqrt(2mE)}{\bar{h}} and l=\frac{\sqrt{2m(E+V_0)}}{\bar{h}}.
Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you may want to check your signs on l.
 
also, to get \hbar in latex, you have to use \hbar inside the tex environment. Using \bar{h} gives you a small line over h: \bar{h}
 
jdwood983 said:
you may want to check your signs on l.

What do you mean? I don't understand where is the problem: I know that E>-V_0, so l\in\mathbb{R}.
 
Matthew888 said:
What do you mean? I don't understand where is the problem: I know that E>-V_0, so l\in\mathbb{R}.

For some reason, I missed the -V_0 and thought that you should have

<br /> l=\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(V_0-E)}<br />

You are correct though.

Are you translating this from another language because you should be looking for an eigenfunction, and from what I understand autofunction is a common translation error. But to finish off the problem, you will need to apply boundary conditions (at x=a and x=0) to find your constants A,\,B,\,C and D.
 
I am translating the problem from Italian :shy:
I found A,B,C,D using the boundary conditions (I don't have doubts about the result because I used a mathematical software). Thank you for helping me.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top