Schutz First Course in GR Problem 15b, chapter 1. Mistake?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential error in a problem regarding Lorentz contraction in special relativity. Participants express concern that the book's approximation of the Lorentz contraction formula, ∆x≈∆x'/√(2ε), is incorrect. They argue that the correct formulation should be ∆x≈∆x' * √(2ε), as this reflects the principle that lengths measured in the moving frame should be shorter. The consensus is that the book likely contains a typo or has defined the variables incorrectly. Overall, the participants agree that the approximation given contradicts the expected behavior of length contraction.
guitarphysics
Messages
241
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Suppose that the velocity of an observer O' relative to O is nearly that of light, |v|=1-ε, 0<ε<<1. Show that the Lorentz contraction formula can by approximated by:
∆x≈∆x'/√(2ε)

Homework Equations


Lorentz contraction, ∆x=∆x'/γ

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it should be ∆x≈∆x'(√(2ε)). (As opposed to divided by the square root of 2ε). Is this a mistake in the book, or am I just being stupid? Don't tell me how to solve it or anything- just if it's a mistake or not; if not, I'll keep trying but I don't want to waste my time if the problem is stated incorrectly. Thanks!Ps. Anybody who likes SR- try out problem 12 from that same chapter, it's very fun :).
PPs. Just thinking intuitively, the approximation given by the problem is incorrect because it'd give a longer length measured by observer O, which just makes no sense. The famous effect is a contraction, after all!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The length is maximum in the frame in which the object is at rest. Usually x' refers to the moving frame of reference. Imagine you stand on the ground and determine the length of a stick in a spaceship. The length of a stick is measured Lo by the astronaut, the observer who moves together with the stick: Δx' = Lo. You measure L=Δx, a shorter length, L=Lo√(1-(v/c2), but that means Δx'=Δx/√(1-(v/c)2).

ehild
 
I agree, and I don't believe I said anything that contradicted any of that. What are your thoughts on the problem? I think it has a typo, and it should say that ∆x is approximately ∆x' *times* sqrt(2 epsilon).
 
guitarphysics said:
I agree, and I don't believe I said anything that contradicted any of that. What are your thoughts on the problem? I think it has a typo, and it should say that ∆x is approximately ∆x' *times* sqrt(2 epsilon).

Yes, you are right if Lo=∆x' and L=∆x, as L should be shorter than Lo :) . It is a typo in the book, or it defined x' and x in the opposite way.

ehild
 
Cool, thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top