Schwartz inequality proof over complex

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Schwartz inequality for complex vectors, specifically for two arbitrary vectors, |a⟩ and |b⟩. The original poster attempts to adapt a proof method used for real vectors to the complex case, raising concerns about the treatment of quadratic forms in the complex domain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of treating the quadratic expression in the complex case, questioning whether the same simplifications apply as in the real case. There is discussion about separating components of the vectors and considering real and imaginary parts of the inner products.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the inner products and the potential complexities introduced by complex numbers. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches, including a suggestion to express one vector in terms of components parallel and perpendicular to the other. A participant has proposed a specific formulation that appears promising, but consensus on the approach has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the vectors are arbitrary, which raises questions about the nature of the inner products involved. There is also mention of constraints on the variable c, with some suggesting it could be complex, while others consider the implications of restricting it to real values.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider any two vectors, |a\rangle and |b\rangle. Prove the Schwartz inequality
<br /> |\langle a|b \rangle |^2 \leq \langle a|a \rangle \langle b|b \rangle<br />


Homework Equations


a basic understanding of vector calculus over \mathbb{C}...


The Attempt at a Solution


I wanted to do this proof almost the same way I do it over \mathbb{R}, except I'm not sure if I can follow through with the normal quadratic part...

I start with |\psi\rangle =|a\rangle + c |b\rangle and using the fact that \langle\psi | \psi \rangle \geq 0 I get
<br /> 0\leq \langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \langle a|a \rangle + c\langle a|b\rangle + c^{\ast}\langle b|a\rangle + |c|^2\langle b|b\rangle<br />
which can be written
<br /> 0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle<br />
So I'm wondering if I can consider this quadratic in c and claim that
<br /> (2|\langle a|b\rangle |)^2-4\langle a|a\rangle \langle b|b\rangle \leq 0<br />

Any help would be appreciated, Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so for the real case
0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

becomes
0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + c\langle a|b\rangle +c^2\langle b|b\rangle

however for the complex case, that simplification does not occur. so I'm not convinced you can treat the quadratic the same as both the complex parts of c & <a|b> will cause complication - that said I'm not that familiar with this method...

The way I've seen that works for a general inner product space is to write |b> in as a summation of components perpendicular and parallel to |a> and prove it direct form there
|b\rangle = \langle a|b \rangle|a \rangle + |z\rangle
 
Why do you think c must be complex? All the inner products you are using result in real numbers.
 
as the vectors are arbitrary <a|b> may be complex

now unless a constraint is put on c, then I would assume it can also be complex

now it is true that all the terms in the following expression are real, otherwise the inequality would not make sense
0 \leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

now say we set c to be from the reals, then the inequality becomes
0 \leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2c\Re[\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

this is a real quadratic in c, though I'm not sure how the part about Re{<a|b>} could be massaged into the required form?
 
Last edited:
If all else fails, split things into real and imaginary parts.
 
I think I got it, let
<br /> |\psi\rangle = |b\rangle - \frac{ \langle a|b\rangle }{\langle a|a\rangle }|a\rangle<br />
then
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> 0\leq \langle \psi|\psi\rangle &amp;= \left( \langle b|-\frac{\langle b|a\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}\langle a| \right) \left( |b\rangle -\frac{\langle a|b\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}|a\rangle \right) \\<br /> &amp;=\langle b|b\rangle - \frac{\langle a|b\rangle \langle b|a\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}<br /> \end{align}<br />
and the result clearly follows.

How does this look?
 
yep that's looking good to me

its worth noting the equality holds when |a> and |b> are parallel
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K