Schwartz QFT book, Problem 14.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter wphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qft
wphysics
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I am working on Schwartz QFT book problem 14.3, particularly part (c).
Basically, it asks us to evaluate the following integration.
\int \cfrac{d^3 p}{2\pi^3} \omega_p e^{i \vec{p} \cdot (\vec{x}-\vec{y})} where
\omega_p = \sqrt{p^2 + m^2}
I could perform the angular integration, and the result is
\cfrac{2}{(2\pi)^2 |x-y|} \int_0^{\infty} dp \,\,p \sqrt{p^2+m^2} \sin{(p|x-y|)} = \cfrac{2}{(2\pi)^2 |x-y|} \textrm{Im}\left( \int_0^{\infty} dp \,\,p \sqrt{p^2+m^2} e^{i p |x-y|} \right)
The textbook says it should be expressed as some sort of Hankel functions, but I am not sure how I get to that point. Do you guys have any suggestion? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it works, but a substitution p2+m2 = x could give interesting results. It makes the exponential more complicated but simplifies everything else.
 
mfb said:
I don't know if it works, but a substitution p2+m2 = x could give interesting results. It makes the exponential more complicated but simplifies everything else.

Could you tell me in more detail? In fact, I could not find any integral representations of Hankel functions that matches with my integration.
 
Did you try it? What was the result?
 
The result is the derivative of the modified Bessel function of the second kind, whose integral representation is
upload_2017-2-12_12-27-45.png

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ModifiedBesselFunctionoftheSecondKind.html

And the solution for the massive case is given in Weinberg's QFT I page 387, which can be derived from the above integral representation. For the massless case, it seems to me that the result is just the limit ##m\rightarrow 0## of the massive case, is this right? In taking the limit that ##m\rightarrow 0##, I didn't encounter any singular behavior.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top