Schwartzschild metric difficulty

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thinkor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Metric
Thinkor
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
I am trying to understand how the Schwartzschild metric works and coming to the conclusion that if I drop an object that it will not fall to the Earth but just stay there when I open my hand. Therefore, I'm confident I have made a mistake, but I don't see where it is.

Here is the metric directly from Schwartzschild's paper. This agrees with various other sources I've seen although the notation is different.

ds2 = (1 - α/R)dt2 - dR2/(1 -α/R) - R2(dθ2 + sin2θ d∅)

where α is the Schwartzschild radius, t is the time coordinate, and R is the radial coordinate. Please note that Schwarzschild uses units where c = 1.

I'm just interested in dropping a clock, so I set dθ and d∅ to zero, reducing the equation to

ds2 = A dt2 - dR2/A

where I have defined A = (1 - α/R) for brevity.

The traveler along this line element will see himself "at rest" and so ds2 will equal dτ2, where τ is the proper time. dτ will equal f dt for some function f of R that reflects slower ticking of the clock as it falls. Thus, we have

f2 dt2 = A dt2 - dR2/A

Rearranging a bit, I get

dR2/A = A dt2 - f2 dt2

Solving for dR/dt yields

dR/dt = (A2 - Af2).5

I then take the derivative to get the acceleration.

d2R/dt2 = .5 (A2 - Af2)-.5 (2A dA/dt - A 2f df/dt - f2 dA/dt))

But, dA/dt = -α/R2 dR/dt, and by hypothesis dR/dt = 0 (we are just dropping an object, whose velocity is initially 0). Therefore, we get

d2R/dt2 = .5 (A2 - Af2)-.5 (- A 2f df/dt))

Since f is a function of R, df/dt = df/dR dR/dt = 0 also initially.

But that means d2R/dt2 = 0 initially as well. So the object does not move!

What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're using trying to use dynamics, but GR is a kinematic theory. This means that the curvature predefines trajectories that will be followed by test particles with given initial conditions and/or proper accelerations. So it is possible to find the 4-velocity of a dropped object but not the way you're attempting.

You should look this up in a textbook, or maybe start with this (very good) article in Wiki.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_geodesics
 
Thinkor said:
The traveler along this line element will see himself "at rest" and so ds2 will equal dτ2, where τ is the proper time. dτ will equal f dt for some function f of R that reflects slower ticking of the clock as it falls. Thus, we have

f2 dt2 = A dt2 - dR2/A
It might be worth noting that:

f2 = A - dR2/(dt2A)

so f is not just a function of R, but a function of R and dt.

These links show how the Schwarzschild acceleration is obtained:

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-07/6-07.htm
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-04/6-04.htm
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top