Science journal finds 20% of its readers are 'doping'

  • Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date
  • #1
2,099
16

Main Question or Discussion Point

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080410.wnature10/BNStory/Science/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20080410.wnature10 [Broken]

hmhmhmh.... :devil:

Next, I would like to know if that's effective in reality, or mostly placebo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Mk
1,963
3
Morally, it puts a disadvantage to people without access
I bet there is a higher incidence of readers of Nature that were born genetically predisposed to being smarter. I suppose that's "a disadvantage to those without access."
 

Related Threads for: Science journal finds 20% of its readers are 'doping'

  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
51
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
47
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top