Scientific inference skill

  • Thread starter Thread starter prof Neuro mg T
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientific
AI Thread Summary
Scientific inference skills involve drawing logical conclusions from observations, evidence, and prior knowledge, utilizing both inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive inference starts with specific observations to form general theories, while deductive inference begins with a hypothesis and tests it through experimentation. The discussion emphasizes that these skills can be developed through practice and are applicable in various fields, including mechanics, programming, and network engineering. Real-world examples illustrate how professionals use scientific inference to diagnose problems and test hypotheses effectively. Mastery of scientific inference is essential for problem-solving across diverse disciplines.
prof Neuro mg T
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Science
Relevant Equations
Inference skill
Please give explanation for scientific inference skill pdf, i wants to deep learn that..
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prof Neuro mg T said:
Homework Statement: Science
Relevant Equations: Inference skill

Please give explanation for scientific inference skill pdf, i wants to deep learn that..
Thank you
Welcome to PF.

Can you please say more about your question? What do you mean by "pdf"? Have you tried doing a Google search on scientific inference skill?
 
Scientific inference skills encompass the ability to draw logical conclusions based on observations, evidence, and prior knowledge. There is Inductive inference. It istarts with observation and leads to broader generalizations or theories. The Deductive inferernce begins with hypothesis and then the experiment to test the theory.
That means that inductive method goes from specific case to general one and the deductive method is vice versa.
In my opinion, it is the skill that you can only learn with a lot of practice. When writing your conclusion you should preoritize describing what you saw during the experiment. In both methods I mentioned earlier you must tell what are the conditions of the experiment, why you choose one theory and not the other one and so on
 
The "scientific inference skill" is nothing magical. Lots of people practice it every day. I spent a career using it and I have never been a practicing scientist.

An auto mechanic uses the skill when diagnosing a problem with your car. The customer reports a symptom. The mechanic may observe the car looking for further symptoms. He comes up with a list of hypotheses for conditions that could explain the symptoms. He runs tests to confirm or rule out various hypotheses. That is scientific inference in action. Theory is the part where you come up with hypotheses. Experiment is the part where you choose which tests to run and run them.

A programmer uses the skill when troubleshooting code. The program runs slow or produces the wrong result. Perhaps it does so intermittently. The programmer comes up with hypotheses about where the fault lies. Maybe in module A. Maybe in subroutine B. He constructs test cases, inserts debugging code or fires up the code debugger to further identify the problem.

An office worker uses the skill when trying to figure out who is stealing lunch on alternate Tuesdays. He comes up with hypotheses about the guilty party. Maybe he runs an experiment with copious quantities of Ex-Lax, ghost peppers or glow in the dark fingerprint dust.

I often used the skill in network engineering. Some application is running slow. How does the application work? This can be surprisingly difficult because end users and even application owners tend not to know how their applications work or even what servers they are using. How can we find out how the application works? Can we catch the problem in action? What bottlenecks could exist on the network? How can we test for them? Do the test results explain the observed symptoms? How can we mitigate or work around the issue? At almost every step in the process, one has hypotheses and testing.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and berkeman
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top