Scientists heed call, but few can find jobs

  • Thread starter Thread starter JFrankParnell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jobs
AI Thread Summary
Physicists and physicians are experiencing low unemployment rates of 1 to 2 percent, largely due to their versatility and high demand in various fields. However, many PhD physicists are working outside their specialty, indicating a challenging academic job market similar to other scientific disciplines. The employment situation for new chemistry PhDs is particularly dire, with a reported 38% employment rate that may include temporary and low-paying positions. The absence of discussion regarding mathematicians and statisticians in the article raises questions about their job market as well. Overall, it emphasizes the importance of having a backup plan in today's competitive job landscape.
JFrankParnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Came across this a few months ago and thought it might be of interest here. This excerpt was most interesting to me:
Two groups seem to be doing better than other scientists: physicists and physicians. The unemployment rate among those two groups hovers around 1 to 2 percent, according to surveys from NSF and other groups. Physicists end up working in many technical fields -- and some go to Wall Street -- while the demand for doctors continues to climb as the U.S. population grows and ages.

link
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find the excerpt interesting with respect to physicists, because from what I have gathered from the commentary here on Physics Forums, while it may indeed be true that the unemployment rate for physicists may be low, that low figure is masked by the number of PhD-level physicists who are working outside of their field. In terms of landing an academic posting (at least as far as the US is concerned), the situation is probably as grim for physicists as it is for other scientists as quoted in the online article.

As an aside, I find it interesting that there is no mention about mathematicians or statisticians in this article.
 
I wouldn't doubt the pain of PhD chemists at all. 38% employment rate for new chemistry Phds is probably high due to the fact that it was an ACS survey (they probably include temp jobs that have almost 0 job security and low paying post docs as being "employed"). Choose wisely and always have a backup plan. If I can't find a job after my studies, I'll probably open up a bakery.
 
gravenewworld said:
I wouldn't doubt the pain of PhD chemists at all. 38% employment rate for new chemistry Phds is probably high due to the fact that it was an ACS survey (they probably include temp jobs that have almost 0 job security and low paying post docs as being "employed"). Choose wisely and always have a backup plan. If I can't find a job after my studies, I'll probably open up a bakery.

that may be because most chem graduates are in bio/organic instead of analytical/physical.
 
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...

Similar threads

Back
Top