SCUnderstanding Sound Waves to Solving Time and Distance Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter star Wise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assistance
AI Thread Summary
A sound pulse traveling at 1,000 meters/second over a distance of 1,000,000 meters will take 2,000 seconds for a round trip. The discussion emphasizes the use of formulas for calculating time based on distance and velocity. A user seeks book recommendations for practice problems related to sound wave calculations. Forum members encourage asking questions directly rather than relying solely on books, offering assistance with understanding the concepts. The importance of showing working out in problems is highlighted to facilitate better support.
star Wise
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question:
Assume that a sound pulse travels with a constant velocity of 1,000 meters/second and that point A is separated from point B by a distance of 1,000,000 meters. Compute the time that elapses between the moment the sound pulse is transmitted at point A, strikes the object at B is reflected back, and arrives back at point A.

Velocity = Distance
Time

Time = Distance
Velocity

Distance = velocity*Time

I have the formulas, but what I am really looking for is a book that has these types of questions. Can anyone suggest a good book to answer these types of question.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
star Wise said:
I have the formulas, but what I am really looking for is a book that has these types of questions. Can anyone suggest a good book to answer these types of question.

Thank you.

Welcome to PF!

Why do you need a book? If there is anything you don't understand please just ask here and someone will be more than willing to help you. Or would you just like more questions like these to practise on?

~H
 
Hello star Wise, I've just received you PM now. If you show your working and answer, we'll try and assist you in understanding the subject more. But the rules of this forum prohibit us helping anyone who doesn't show any working or thoughts.

Regards,
~H
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top