Seat Belt constraints in a crashing car

AI Thread Summary
A properly restrained individual in a car crash can survive deceleration up to 30 g's, which equates to about 294 m/s². To calculate the distance required for a car to come to a complete stop from 80 km/h, one must consider the uniform deceleration. The initial calculations mistakenly treated the car's speed as constant, leading to incorrect distance estimates. A specific kinematic equation should be applied to account for the changing speed during deceleration, ensuring accurate results. Correctly applying these principles is essential for determining safe design parameters for vehicle crumple zones.
atbruick
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person who is properly constrained by an over-the-shoulder seat belt has a good chance of surviving a car collision if the deceleration does not exceed about 30 "g's" (1.0 g = 9.80 m/seconds squared).

Assuming uniform deceleration of this value, calculate the distance over which the front end of the car must be designed to collapse if a crash brings the car to rest from 80 km/h.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
How long does it take to go from a speed of 80 km/h to 0 km/h, if the speed decreases by 30x9.80 m/s every second?
What distance would one travel if moving from stand still at acceleration 30x9.80 m/s in this time?
 
For the first I got 22 m/s (instead of 80km/h) then divided that by 30*9.80m/s and got 0.075, which is the time it would take to go from 22 m/s to 0 m/s in the crash.

Then I found in that time frame a person could travel 1.65, or 1.7 meters. I hope these calculations are right; I entered 1.7 into the answer and it was wrong.
 
"30*9.80 m/s" (velocity) is not the same as "30*9.80 m/s per second" (acceleration)

There exists a specific kinematic equation that you should be using to get a better answer.
 
It appears you assumed that the car was going 22m/s the whole time during that 0.076 seconds, but the car is decelerating during that time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top