Second fundamental form and Mean Curvature

aCHCa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Metric ansatz:
<br /> ds^{2} = e^{\tilde{A}(\tilde{\tau})} d\tilde{t} - d\tilde{r} - e^{\tilde{C}(\tilde{\tau})} dΩ<br />

where: d\tilde{r} = e^{\frac{B}{2}} dr

Homework Equations



How to calculate second fundamental form and mean curvature from this metric?

The Attempt at a Solution



Metric tensor:

g_{00}= e^{\tilde{A}(\tilde{\tau})}
g_{11}= -1
g_{22}= - e^{\tilde{C}(\tilde{\tau})}
g_{33}- e^{\tilde{C}(\tilde{\tau})} sin^2 θ

Second fundamental form:

h_{ij}= g_{kl} \Gamma^{k}_{ij} n^{l}

where:

i, j, k, l = 0, 1, 2, 3

n^{l} =normal vector = (0, 1, 0, 0)

so:

n^{0} = 0
n^{1} = 1
n^{2} = 0
n^{3} = 0

Second fundamental form:

h_{ij}= diag (\frac{1}{2}e^{\tilde{A}}\tilde{A&#039;}, 0, \frac{1}{2}e^{\tilde{C}}\tilde{C&#039;}, sin {θ} cos {θ})

Mean curvature:

h = g^{ij}h_{ij}= \frac{1}{2}\tilde{A&#039;}-\frac{1}{2}\tilde{C&#039;}-e^{-\tilde{C}}cot {θ}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea seems correct, but I don't understand what you're doing. Is there any r-dependence in the metric? If not, then all the relevant Christoffel symbols vanish and the extrinsic curvature should be zero (all r=const hyperslices are flat)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top