Second Order Stationary Process

cdplayersony
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let X(t), -inf< t < inf, be a second order process. Show that it is a second order stationary process if and only if mu(t) sub x is independent of t and r(s,r) sub x depends only on the difference between s and t.

Show that is a second order stationary process if and only if EX(s) and EX(s)X(s+t) are both independent of s.

Set Y(t)=X(t+1)-X(t), -inf< t <inf. Show that the Y(t) process is a second order stationary process having zero means and covariance function: r(t) sub y =2*r(t) sub x -r(t-1) sub x -r(t+1) sub x


Homework Equations


mu(t) sub x is the mean function =EX(t)
r(s,t) sub x is the covariance function EX(s)X(t)-EX(s)EX(t)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know that if r(s,t) depends only on the difference between s and t r(s,t)=r(0, t-s) where r(t)=r(0,t) and this is the auto-covariance function of the process, but I just can't seem to get these relations proven. Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of "second order stationary process" should certainly be included under "Relevant Equations" (even though, it is technically not simply an equation). Those of us who don't remember it might be able to help if we are reminded.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top